Macbeth by way of McDonald’s

Just back from a weekend at camp.  Catching up on a season six episode of 30 Rock led me to this gem, which I had no recollection of when the season originally aired.

Fassbender’s Macbeth has nothing on Mayor McCheese.

Posted in Books, Television | Tagged | Leave a comment

Re:Mediation

Yesterday I posted a recent WuMo Sunday strip that made nods at the role of a technology popular long before our phones and tablets: the book.  Two other recent WuMo strips bring things closer to the present, particularly in how technology mediates the world for us.

A line of reasoning that can be easy for many to take:

WuMo PresentAnd something we should hope never happens:

WuMo WW3Early next week I’ll post my second reflection on Alan Jacobs’s Living and Thinking in a Digital Age course.

(images from gocomics.com)

Posted in Comics, Internet | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Booking Your Attention

It almost feels like the guys behind WuMo have been following Alan Jacobs’s class on living in a digital age.  This recent Sunday strip hits on a point that shows up in the one particular part of his course: a reminder that technology has been around for a long time (and that it’s always been something of a distraction).

Wumo - wm170917comb_ts.tifThat’ll be part of my reflection on the course next week.  A good reminder, regardless.  The question ends up being, though, are our digital devices on another level altogether.  Unfortunately, it seems like time will have to tell for us.

(image from gocomics.com)

Posted in Comics, Internet | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Return to the Good Place

Somehow I missed the announcement that the second season of NBC’s The Good Place was premiering tonight.  Here’s a quick “look” at the new season, which picks up from season one in a way that makes everything just new enough, it seems.

Season one spent a lot of time being both fascinating (“I can’t believe they did that!”) and challenging (“they just mentioned some legitimate ethical philosophers!”).  This season looks to be more like a version of Lewis’s Screwtape Letters . . . just with lots more tech.  As one of the few all-new shows that stuck with me last year, I’m hopeful that this show won’t experience any sophomore slump.

Posted in Television | Tagged | Leave a comment

Loves You Most, Knows You Best

Today marks the twentieth year since the tragic death of Rich Mullins.  Andrew Peterson recently did a long interview with Andy Greer for CCM Magazine in which the musician reflected on the significance of Mullins for his life of faith.  It’s a great interview, with a number of great moments that capture something significant (and seemingly missing) about the life of faith in contemporary music and practice.  Well worth watching the whole thing.

Posted in Faith, Music | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Class in Session: In a Digital Age

it's complicatedA few weeks ago, one of my favorite authors posted the syllabus to “Living and Thinking in a Digital Age,” the honors course he would be teaching this fall semester.  Beyond that, he posted links and DropBox-copies for most of the class readings.  You can read the course syllabus here.  I decided to “take” the class myself, particularly as questions of analog and digital have become a hot topic in my vocational circle.

The first “chunk” of the course focused on “trying to get a grip on the digital tech that shapes our everyday lives.”  The reading for the section included to chapters from It’s Complicated by Danah Boyd and articles on smartphones, cognition, and teenage use of SnapChat.

It’s amazing how dated It’s Complicated reads, even though it was published in early 2014.  Boyd acknowledges this, of course.  And she does her best to point out underlying trends and realities that predate social media that have been consistent of the teenage-experience of socialization.  That was one takeaway from the reading for me: that, as with so much other stuff, digital stuff mostly just accelerates and emphasizes preexisting trends.  Boyd asserts that social media represents “networked publics,” which are digital instead of brick-and-mortar like malls and theaters.  Something new about social media, Boyd asserts, is that “social network sites downplayed the importance of interests and made friendship the organizing tenant of the genre.”  Beyond that, social media seems to be the “real replacement” for the mass culture that people my age and older grew up with.  Ultimately, in Boyd’s view, social media as networked publics have four “affordances”:

+ persistence: the durability of online expressions and content;

+ visibility: the potential audience who can bear witness;

+ spreadability: the ease with which content can be shared; and

+ search ability: the ability to find content.

The second chunk of Boyd’s work for the course focused on the idea that kids today are “digital natives.”  There are social class concerns embedded with Boyd’s thinking, which definitely teases things out in a direction I did not predict.  But she also focuses on the simple assertion that maybe kids aren’t as “digitally native” as we think.  I see that quite often with students who can work their phones adequately but who search for gmail instead of typing in the address, who have used laptops for years but have no knowledge about changing margins in a word processing program.

Beyond these basic assertions, two other things from Boyd stand out.  The first has to do with adult apprehension of digital technology.  When it comes to an adult perspective on teen use of social media, Boyd asserts:

More often than not, what emerges out of the people’s confusion takes the form of utopian and dystopian rhetoric . . . such as the dystopian notion that teens are addicted to social media or the utopian idea that technology will solve inequality.

The second has to do with what ultimately motivates teenagers when it comes to social media.  Boyd asserts:

Most teens are not compelled by gadgetry as such– they are compelled by friendship.  The gadgets are interesting to them primarily as a means to a social end.  Furthermore, social interactions may be a distraction from school, but they are not a distraction from learning.

I don’t totally track well with Boyd there, but I appreciate the distinction she makes.  There are always present those entranced with gadgets, those who would rather fiddle with objects than work things out with people.  It’s the promise of connection and friendship, it seems, that drives usage.  I do wonder, though, what Boyd thinks constitutes “learning.”

+ + + + + + +

What I appreciate about the course, and Jacobs’s thinking in general, is that it presents technology and its effects as a necessary and good conversation.  Too often “technological determinism” keeps those kinds of conversations from happening until decisions are already made, implemented, and regretted.

The next “chunk” of the course focuses on higher education.  I’ll reflect on that chunk soon.

(image from amazon.com)

Posted in Books, Teaching | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Sunday’s Best: Linus Reading Ethan Frome

There is something interesting going on with today’s classic Peanuts strip by Charles Schulz.

Linus Reading Ethan FromeIt’s something about Linus’s ability to “tell it like it is.”  On one level, it looks like an instance where Linus is “working the system” and getting out of writing a full-fledged paper.  On the other hand, you almost think Linus is utterly sincere.  For the literature major, though, this way of “telling it like it is” flies in the face of the idea (or hope) that literature can transcend things like marital status.

(image from gocomics.com)

Posted in Books, Comics, Teaching | 1 Comment