Sunday’s Best: Complexity

A bit of an odd day in the funny pages today.  Maybe it’s the post-New-Year’s/pre-Valentine’s Day slump.  Today’s Frazz stands out as a thoughtful peace though, encapsulating the unintended (and intended) consequences of complex situations.  Not something you see in a comic strip all that often, for sure.  I’m just not sure that “peace” is the actual outcome.

Frazz Complexity(image from

Posted in Comics | Leave a comment

Sunday’s Best: Seasonal Rates

Today’s classic Peanuts strip is good in its own right (and by good, I mean both quirky and a little sad), but it also has a feature I’ve not seen before in a Peanuts strip . . .

Peanuts Seasonal RatesI’d never known Lucy’s rate to be 7 cents and not 5.  Turns out, it’s a seasonal thing.  What’s also funny and sad is that the rate is the same even when it’s a snowman stand-in.  Poor Charlie Brown.

(image from

Posted in Comics | Leave a comment

“The Weeks Are Just Packed”

Once again, Jef Mallett gets the sense of the last couple of weeks spot-on.

Frazz Packed WeeksThe weeks, Calvin might say, are just packed.  It’s the closest things have been to the chaos of this time last year (thankfully, I did not have chapel and camp to worry about).  I’m hoping that I’ve learned some lessons, as it feels like things aren’t going to calm down all that much for the next few weeks.

(image from

Posted in Comics, Teaching | Leave a comment

Sunday’s Best: Sunday Snowday

Snow is all over the funny pages today, in both classic and contemporary strips.  This classic Peanuts Sunday strip by Charles Schulz is both philosophical and practical in a fun way.  Lucy and Linus both have a real way with words.

Peanuts Snowball(image from

Posted in Comics | Leave a comment

Lord of the Full-Season Review

The last week or so has been pretty busy, which explains my dropping of some threads here even if it doesn’t excuse it.  Back to those threads soon.  But for now . . .

The Nerd of the Rings recap of each episode of The Rings of Power was almost as interesting as show itself.  Before Christmas, a full-season review of the show’s first outing was promised, and it finally dropped today.  I’m putting it here for sharing . . . and for reminding myself to watch it soon.

Posted in Internet, Television | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Sunday’s Best: What Was She Thinking?

Probably that the lighting was nice and the background angle was perfect.  Alas, Medusa.  A little bit of Narcissus, too, it seems.

WuMo Medusa(image from

Posted in Comics | Tagged | Leave a comment

“Where Self-Improvement Goes to Die”

I’ll try and get back to Charles Taylor and the contemporary church tomorrow.  Today I’d like to past a weekday comic strip or two that I’ve saved for later but not gotten around to posting.

+ + + + + + +

Something interesting is going on in the classic Peanuts strip.  Turns out the school the kids attend, and that Sally sometimes talks to, has given up . . .

Peanuts School Down 1And the immediate consequence for the kids?

Peanuts School Down 2Leaves you wondering what, if anything, Schulz was trying to communicate.

+ + + + + + +

Frazz has been great during this “new year” season.  This recent strip has some great dialogue and a resounding sentiment . . .

Frazz Self Improvement“January is where self-improvement goes to die” is just a great line.

+ + + + + + +

Finally, a classic Calvin and Hobbes.  Watterson did such an amazing job rendering a great moment.  His use of shadow is amazing.  This one-panel black-and-white strip ranks up there with the best of the Sunday strips in so many ways.

Calvin Fire PlaceSome days I’m a little sad that the classic Calvin and Hobbes strips aren’t retooled or colored.  But strips like this exceed expectations by remaining in black and white.

(images from

Posted in Comics, Teaching | Tagged | Leave a comment

Sunday’s Best: Someday Balance

Caulfield and Frazz have been “on fire” when it comes to thinking about the end of one year and the beginning of another.  Today’s Frazz is another picture of the hopes and realities of starting a new year.

Frazz Balance(image from

Posted in Comics, The Long Story | Tagged | Leave a comment

Between Stories and Ages

In his discussion of churches and “the therapeutic gospel,” Brad East writes this about a possible generational difference in retelling the Gospel:

Boomers, Gen X, and even some older Millennials do not want to reproduce what they understand themselves to have received: namely, an imbalanced spiritual formation, whereby believers of every age, but especially youth, are perpetually held out over the flames of hell, rotting and smoldering in the stench of their sin, unless and until God snatches them back—in the nick of time—upon their confession of faith and/or baptism. Such ministers and older believers do not want, in other words, young people to feel themselves to be sinners, tip to toe and all the way through. Instead, they want them to feel themselves beloved by God. For they are. They are God’s creatures, made in his image, for whom Christ died.

He goes on to say:

But there’s the catch. Why would Christ die for creatures about whom all we can say is, they are beloved of God, and not also, they have sinned and fallen short of God’s glory? The more sin drops out of the grammar of Christian life, the more the cross of Jesus becomes unintelligible. So much so that children and teenagers can’t articulate, even in basic terms, why Jesus came to earth, died, and rose again.

The story we tell matters.  And I don’t mean “story” in a fictional sense.  I mean “story” in the narrative that we live by.  And a story that should be able to hold together “sin” and “love” may seem impossible, but I have to believe that it is possible and true.

+ + + + + + +

There are other stories that the church tells (and that it tells itself).  East mentions some essential elements in the remainder of his post.  What I want to do, for a paragraph or two, is redirect attention to something I learned from reading A Secular Age by Charles Taylor, which is itself a story of how the West went from a Christian understanding of the world to one in which disbelief in a transcendent God has become the new default.  It’s a story involving two different ages.

The first age Taylor calls the Age of Mobilization.  About the time that Luther nailed his theses to the Wittenberg Cathedral door, a shift was occurring that decentralized that Catholic Church and its social imaginary from its dominant position.  Things were splintering (perhaps in slow motion, but still splintering).  What that does is create an opportunity for new forms of things (or re-freshed forms of old things).  Such opportunities were often led by cultural elites and involved recruitment into something new: a new denomination or church, a new social movement, a new scientific field.  And so mobilization became the dominant note for some time.  All cards on the table: it’s clear to me that some level of mobilization is built into the Christian Story.  You see it in Jesus sending out his disciples, in the Great Commission, and throughout the book of Acts.  What the Age of Mobilization does (in my estimation) is it acts as a kind of “hot house” that accelerates things on multiple levels.  And organisms (and organizations) can’t live long that way.  (For more on that, see the writings of Andrew Root, who writes about this a lot and has obviously influenced me.)

Then, thanks to the expressive individualism found in the Romantic movement amongst other areas, the West moves into a second age: the Age of Authenticity.  It’s a kind of interior turn, one that rejects the idea that you are defined by what is outside or beyond you; instead, who you really are is determined by what is on the inside.  You see it in lots of areas of life, of course.  It’s “your best life now” married to “telling your own truth.”  And while it has had seriously negative or disastrous consequences (same as some aspects of the Age of Mobilization), Taylor suggests that there are also some positive things to come from the shift.  I think some of the talk of a “therapeutic church” has its roots in the Age of Authenticity.  And many churches, especially those still driven by the Age of Mobilization, don’t know what to do about it.  Ultimately, both Ages fall short of the full Christian story.

As a member of an evangelical Christian church in the Baptist tradition, I feel the tension all of the time (and have for some time, so this isn’t just about one church . . . the same can also be said of para-church ministries, too).  The people in charge are always trying to get people to do something.  There are many needs in the world around us (of this there is no doubt), and people are needed to help meet those needs (to be the hands and feet of Jesus, some would say).  But drumming up participation can ultimately beat everyone down.  One almost can’t blame people who leave “mobilizing” churches for churches who seem to take a real “interest” in the hearts, minds, bodies, and souls of people.  Enter the “therapeutic church.”  Enter care for people who are on a quest for “authenticity” who want to be all God wants them to be (and who don’t have to be on three committees to do so).

+ + + + + + +

Both ages are, of course, incomplete.  They are parentheticals in a bigger bracketed equation.  But I imagine it is difficult to do both well and in balance (just like it can be difficult to hold sin and love together, it seems).  (I also imagine that I have grossly miss-summarized Taylor’s argument.)  But the Christian story, with Jesus at the heart, calls us reconcile lots of things that might seem irreconcilable.  The sunk costs of the Age of Mobilization are huge, though, just like the promises of the Age of Authenticity my prove to be phantasms.

+ + + + + + +

I’ve got more to think through with East’s essay.  But before I return to it, I want to say one more thing about Taylor’s work in A Secular Age.  But I’ll save that for tomorrow.

Posted in Books, Faith, Life in the Fifth Act, Notes for a World's End, Organizations and Institutions, The Long Story | Leave a comment

On the Twelfth Day of Christmas . . .

For some time, I’ve been meaning to write something about this blog post by Brad East of Abilene Christian University.

+ + + + + + +

I discovered East’s blog through Twitter some time in 2022.  It was a great find for me, as he writes as both a teacher (at the college level) and someone invested in the Bible.  I had unexpected pleasure of meeting him this summer while at Laity Lodge.  He was there as a guest of one of the speakers.  When I saw his name on the guest list (which everyone receives upon arrival), I was super-excited.  It was a real joy to talk with him a couple of times, both as Christians and as teachers.

+ + + + + + +

East wrote the above-linked-to post near the end of an online discussion about what actually gets preached in most churches these days.  There has been great concern about churches and pastors taking more of a “therapeutic approach” to the Christian life, one that focuses on the wellness of life without much connection with the Gospel.  East begins his piece with lots of links to previous moments in the discussion.  Then he adds his own thoughts, which amount to five big ideas.

+ + + + + + +

Before he gets to the list of his five big ideas, East spends some time talking about sin and the shift that has occurred in churches, likely as a response to what he calls the “imbalanced spiritual formation” from previous generations.  I want to start there tomorrow and take a detour into one of the most important books I’ve read over the last few years.

But more than anything else on this twelfth and final day of Christmas, I wanted (at the very least) to link to the East blog post that I’ve been thinking about for some time now.  There are lots of wonderful things to unpack with it.

Posted in Faith, Notes for a World's End, Scripture, Teaching, The Long Story, Travel | Leave a comment