On England and Her Many Churches

IMG_0612Something this last fall’s trip to England did not allow that my first trip did was the opportunity to sneak in and have a quiet moment in the many churches we came across.  I still got to walk through York Minster and into the entry area of St. Paul’s.  We even attended a service at a church in Haworth, where the Bronte patriarch had been rector.

Niall Gooch just posted a short essay that captures a lot of what I think about and hope for, and he does it by reflecting on England’s ecclesial landscape.  From the essay:

Christianity has left a powerful mark in the British landscape, just as it has in our laws and culture. Whether or not we approve of or believe in the faith is irrelevant. Its physical legacy in our countryside and towns is a fact. Even non-Christians feel the draw of locations “where prayer has been valid”, as Eliot puts it in Little Gidding. If you doubt this, consider the vast crowds who visit cathedrals each year, and perhaps more significantly the steady stream of visitors to even the most humble of parish churches. It’s not uncommon when perusing the visitor book in churches to come across phrases like “such a peaceful, prayerful spot” or “a wonderful place to just sit and be still”. The feeling of reverence that doubters and sceptics have for such places has never been more beautifully expressed than in Philip Larkin’s masterpiece “Church Going.” Larkin was nobody’s idea of a devout Christian, but many critics have noted his continuing preoccupation with churches and the fundamental religious questions. At the core of Church Going is the insight that churches cannot and will not cease to be places of meaning and exploration, even if they are no longer used for organised Christian worship, “Since someone will forever be surprising/A hunger in himself to be more serious/And gravitating with it to this ground/Which he once heard was proper to grow wise in /If only that so many dead lie round.”

He goes on to talk about the thinking of Rod Dreher (which I need to get to here some time soon), thoughts about culture and buildings and beliefs and rediscovering a necessary rootedness as we move further into the 21st century.

You can read the whole essay here.  I think you’ll like it.

(photo of Saint Paul’s Cathedral in London; hat tip for the essay to Rod Dreher)

Posted in Faith, Internet, Travel | Leave a comment

Redundant Redundancy

redundantOne of the most interesting parts of leading a group of students across England during last fall break was the logistical aspect of things: how do you effectively move four dozen people from one place to another on time and without losing anyone?  That translated into questions like “how often do chaperons check in with their students?” and “how often do I need to repeat even the most basic of instructions?”  Miscommunication (on both ends) is an amazing thing.

In his book The Advantage, Patrick Lencioni tackles the topic of redundancy head-on.  From the chapter on overcommunicating clarity:

Many [leaders] don’t enjoy the reminding role because it seems wasteful and inefficient to them.  They’ve been trained to avoid redundancy in virtually every aspect of their work, so embracing it in communication isn’t easy for them.  But some leaders aren’t so much worried about the wastefulness of overcommunication; they fear that repeating a message might be insulting to their audience . . .

The point of leadership is not to keep the leader entertained, but to mobilize people around what is most important.  When that calls for repetition and reinforcement, which it almost always does, a good leader relished that responsibility.

Repetition is more than just a matter of communicating something again and again in the same way.  Effective communication requires that key messages come from different sources and through various channels, using a variety of tools.

It’s funny.  In the classroom, I’ve definitely learned this.  Repetition in bits and pieces is a way of reviewing in order to turn content into background knowledge.  But it does feel different when being repetitive for peers.  I feel it every time I’m on the agenda in a faculty meeting.  Lencioni is correct, though.  Redundancy isn’t necessarily a bad thing.  More often than not, it’s a necessary and good thing.  We’ve just been trained to think otherwise.

You can read more reflection on The Advantage here, here, and here.

(image from bbc.com)

Posted in Books, Teaching | Leave a comment

The Doctor, the Detective, and Moffat

Moffat.jpgJust over a week ago, fans of Doctor Who were handed three bits of information that brought great joy to some but some sadness to others.  And because show runner Steven Moffat is involved, Sherlock plays into the conversation a little bit, too.

The first bit of information was that the tenth “series” of Doctor Who would not air until the spring of 2017.  That means the stretch of an entire year between “The Husbands of River Song” and whatever comes next for the Doctor.  On one level, this could be a new thing, since the show needs to cast a new companion.  At the same time, that’s a long wait.  Not as long as our wait for Sherlock, mind you, but a wait nonetheless.

The second bit of information was that the tenth series of Doctor Who would be Steven Moffat’s last.  This was met with great excitement by some sectors of Who-dom.  While he hasn’t been the show’s only show-runner since the NuWho reboot, he has been the most prolific.  He was often the writer of the best episodes from the Russell T. Davies era. And while many of his episodes-as-writer were good, fans thought the poor quality of other episodes really brought the show down.  I don’t totally agree with this assessment, but I understand it.  I think series five (his first) and series nine (the most recent) were two of the best of NuWho.  I don’t think, though, that Matt Smith’s Doctor will “age” as well as David Tennant’s.  I’m also not sure how well Amy and Rory Pond will “age.”  I would love to be proven wrong.  Only time (and space) will tell.

The third bit of information was the Chris Chibnall would be taking over with series eleven.  This has left a good amount of Who-dom at least a bit skeptical.  Moffat had some amazing NuWho episode under his belt before taking on the show.  Chibnall?  Not so much.  The thing he has going for him, of course, is Broadchurch, the BBC series that loves to beat its audience emotionally and mercilessly.  Even in the weakest moments of that show’s second season, it carried tons of weight and was wonderfully acted.  I’m not sure how that will translate to the Doctor, though, especially when we have episodes like “Dinosaurs on a Spaceship” to get over.

Count me among those sad to see Moffat go.  When he was “on,” he was really “on.”  He consistently got the pathos right (something I felt Davies did occasionally but not often enough).  There were still too many “interior” or “static” episodes for my taste (trapped in a freaky house, trapped in another spaceship, trapped near the center of the earth), but maybe that won’t be as evident from a safer distance in time (and another viewing).  Miracle of miracles: by the end of her run, Moffatt had made me a fan of Clara.  The first series with Amy was spot-on.  The last series with Clara was, too.  Most of the stuff in-between?  I’ll have to think about it.  Moffatt’s masterful work on the 50th anniversary special, though, makes him deserving of the fan’s gratitude as much as anything else.

We still get Moffatt with Sherlock, of course.  That show has also had something of an issue with getting consistent episodes out.  Last month’s “new year’s” episode was a nice oasis in a three-year desert.  I missed the original air-date of the episode, but that made me all the more excited to see it at the theater that next week.  And I really, really enjoyed it.  I walked in believing that it would be set entirely in the past, with no real connection to the main series beyond the creators and cast.  So when the scene flashed to Sherlock on the plane, I was quite surprised.  I liked the porous nature of the two realities.  Granted, it’s probably easier for me to think of the two stories as different realities instead of one being an egg nested in the other.  I found the “abominable bride” story engaging and just short of heavy-handed in its moral.  And while I’m not sure the “present day” part of the story is ultimately satisfying (let’s face it, it wasn’t), it is good to know that though dead, Moriarty will always have a presence in Sherlock’s mind palace.

And so now “a year without.”  I do hope that when Moffat returns for his final season that it is unlike anything we have seen so far.  I think his “River Song wrap up” from the Christmas special is  actually the perfect “farewell” episode.  I hope they map out something big and brave that doesn’t involve too many psychological episodes and doesn’t bring in the Dalek or the Cybermen (or even the Silence, really).  I hope it’s a season for sowing seeds that new writers will reap for years to come.  With that kind of hope, maybe this “year off” is something of a gift.

(image from doctorwhotv.co.uk)

Posted in Internet, Television | Tagged , | Leave a comment

On Friendship

Friendship is an obstetric art; it draws out our richest and deepest resources; it unfolds the wings of our dreams and hidden indeterminate thoughts; it serves as a check on our judgments, tries out our new ideas, keeps up our ardor, and enflames our enthusiasm. . .

In any case, even if you are materially isolated, seek out in spirit the society of the friends of the true.  Join their assembly, feel yourself in brotherhood with them and with all the seekers, all the creators that Christianity brings together.  The Communion of Saints is not a phalanstery; nevertheless it is a unity.  “The flesh” -alone- “profiteth nothing”: the spirit, even alone, can do something.  The unanimity which bears fruit consists not so much in being together in one place, or belonging to a group with a label, as in this: that each one should labor with the feeling that others also are laboring, that each one in his place should concentrate on the work while others also are concentrating: so that one task be accomplished, that one principle of life and activity be its guiding spirit; and that the parts of the watch, to each of which a home worker devotes his exclusive attention, be put together by God.

from Sertillanges’s The Intellectual Life, trans. by Mary Ryan

Posted in Books, Faith, Teaching | Tagged | Leave a comment

Some Simple Stage Directions

One of the New Testament texts that I use to illustrate “life in the fifth act” to my students is Colossians 3-4.  One particular chunk reads:

Therefore, as God’s chosen people, holy and dearly loved, clothe yourselves with compassion, kindness, humility, gentleness and patience.  Bear with each other and forgive one another if any of you has a grievance against someone. Forgive as the Lord forgave you.  And over all these virtues put on love, which binds them all together in perfect unity. (NIV)

Last week in class, I introduced my students to virtue theory, which often strikes them as strange because virtue-talk isn’t something you hear much these days.  I was pleased to find this video by one of my favorite authors, James K. A. Smith, who talks about “Christian virtues” (which I really shouldn’t have to put in quotes).

The video was put together by an organization called The Colossian Way, which sounds pretty interesting.  You can read more about them here.

Posted in Faith, Internet, Teaching | Leave a comment

A Novel Future for Outlaws of Time

outlawsof_time_hc_cI inadvertently became a fan of N. D. Wilson a few years ago.  While I had heard he was a great non-fiction writer, it was his 100 Cupboards series (for kids) that really got me reading his work.  It was more like Summerland than Narnia, and yet it still packed a punch to the heart.  It brought the best of a number of worlds together, themes from many other children’s books but with a twist that was hard to get a real hold on.

Wilson’s Ashtown Burials series took a while to grow on me.  The series brought in some interesting historical figures but recast them in a great struggle between the forces of good and evil (and in this series, the evil was almost palpable).  I’m sad that the final book in the series hasn’t found a publisher, because I really want to know how the story ends.

The good news is, though, that Wilson has a new book series dropping in April: Outlaws of Time- The Legend of Sam Miracle. Clicking on the book’s cover will take you to the Entertainment Weekly site that has the exclusive “book trailer” as well as an excerpt from the book’s beginning.

I’ve posted about Wilson and his work before (essays, too): here, here, and here.

Posted in Books, Faith, Internet | Tagged | Leave a comment

What’s Your Line?

Yesterday afternoon I shared this video with my colleagues:

I’ve been playing “90-Second Alphabet” for years, mostly with communication skills classes and in homerooms.  After reading Kevin VanHoozer’s Drama of Doctrine, though, I started to see an interesting connection between the game and the biblical story.

Playing off the idea of the biblical-story-as-a-play, VanHoozer suggests that Christians in our part should as one question in particular: how can we play our roles in the story fittingly?  We know what is fitting because of what we see happening in the story before us.

I posed the question of connection between this improv game and the nature of the biblical story, and I was excited to hear all of the answers: things about being in a story where certain things have already been determined, the nature of having to work and speak in community, the fact that there are some “letters” that are difficult and yet necessary to complete the task, the presence of an end-point in both.  All things true about the story that we are in together.

Posted in Books, Internet, Teaching | Tagged | Leave a comment

The Story We are In

At the beginning of the school year, I showed this quick GEICO commercial to our faculty and staff as a way to introduce being in the biblical story.

I was in no way calling the Bible a horror story.  Instead, I tried to help my co-workers see that it is of vital importance to understand the kind of story we are in.  If the people in the commercial were a little more self-aware, a little more story-aware, they wouldn’t say or do the things they say and do.  It’s the same way with  us.  Knowing the story well helps us play our part in the story more “fittingly” (to use the word of Kevin VanHoozer).

I’m continuing the conversation this afternoon with my co-workers.  We aren’t just in the story . . . we’re in the story together.

Posted in Faith, Internet, Teaching, Television | Leave a comment

“More Can Be Mended”

It is all too easy to forget that what is presupposition for me can be something totally foreign and nonsensical to someone else.  Just this past week a student almost incredulously asked me about waiting for Jesus to return, which is so much a given in some circles that to question it revealed a certain amount of cognitive dissonance.  The question was a good reminder for me to be careful of what I take for granted.

I really like the way Francis Spufford articulates some of those necessary “impossibilities” of the Christian faith.  Here he talks with the Centre for Public Christianity about “the unexpected Jesus.”

If you haven’t done so, you really should give Spufford’s Unapologetic a try.

Posted in Books, Faith, Internet, Teaching | Tagged | Leave a comment

Singing with a Soul on Fire

“Soul on Fire” by Andrew Osenga (and recorded for “the Wine Box”).

Posted in Music | Leave a comment