Time, Why (Do I Let) You Punish Me?

I’ve been meaning for some time to write a post or five about Douglas Rushkoff’s Present Shock.  It was one of my favorite reads of 2013 and has been the book I find myself thinking about the most from last year.  Well, the folks at Whole Foods have made a nice video with Rushkoff in which he brings out some of the books highlights.  It’s an interesting take on chronos vs. kairos, which are terms you often hear when pastors parse the Greek words for time.

 

One thing the clip does not go into are the five major consequences of “present shock.”  Whole Foods even did a nifty chart of those five consequences: narrative collapse, digiphrenia, overwinding, fractalnoia, and apocalypto.  I highly encourage you to read the book, though you can check out the brief descriptions of these “new realities” here.

Posted in Books, Internet | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Easter and the Window Love Left

A song to celebrate the Day.

Posted in Faith, Internet, Music | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Lewis and Catastrophic History

C. S. LewisSomething to reflect on from the introduction of C. S. Lewis’s The Problem of Pain:

 There was a man born among these Jews who claimed to be, or to be the son of, or to be “one with”, the Something which is at once the awful haunter of nature and the giver of the moral law. The claim is so shocking—a paradox, and even a horror, which we may easily be lulled into taking too lightly—that only two views of this man are possible. Either he was a raving lunatic of an usually abominable type, or else He was, and is, precisely what He said. There is no middle way. If the records make the first hypothesis unacceptable, you must submit to the second. And if you do that, all else that is claimed by Christians becomes credible—that this Man, having been killed, was yet alive, and that His death, in some manner incomprehensible to human thought, has effected a real change in our relations to the “awful” and “righteous” Lord, and a change in our favor.

To ask where the universe as we see it looks more like the work of a wise and good Creator or the word of chance, indifference, or malevolence, is to omit from the outset all the relevant factors in the religious problems. Christianity is not the conclusion of a philosophical debate on the origins of the universe: it is a catastrophic historical event following on the long spiritual preparation of humanity which I have described. It is not a system into which we have to fit the awkward fact of pain: it is itself one of the awful facts which have to be fitted into any system we make.

Italic emphasis added.

Posted in Books, Faith | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Osenga Sampler

Andrew Osenga's HeartLast year brilliant Nashville musician Andrew Osenga posted plans for a Kickstarter project: Heart & Soul, Flesh & Bone, a four-EP collection with each EP focused on one of four of the title’s theme.  This first EP, Heart, dropped a couple of weeks ago.  It’s a great bundle of thoughtful music that you should definitely check out.  You can hear the entirety of one song, “Out of Town,” here.  The folks at the Rabbit Room also posted a song-by-song breakdown based on Osenga’s own reflections, which is pretty cool.  You can also check out snippets of each song while you listen here.  My favorites so far are “No Heart Beats Alone” and “She is a Foreign Country.”  You can purchase the EP through iTunes or over at the Rabbit Room.

Posted in Faith, Internet, Music | Tagged | Leave a comment

Must-See Hobbit TV

This is what the internet was made for. . .

 

The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug dropped this past week.  Can’t wait to see what the extended version looks like.  Someday soon I’ll get my thoughts on my last viewing of DOS down.

Hat-tip: The folks at aintitcool.com.

Posted in Books, Internet, Movies | Tagged | Leave a comment

What You Love and How You Love It

One of the biggest blessings in my understanding of things over the last couple of years has been the writings of James K. A. Smith.  His Desiring the Kingdom was a real “right place, right time” scenario for me.  He’s got a couple of new books dropping over the next few weeks (one on relativism and another on culture) that might be a little heady, but that’s okay.  Heady can be a good challenge.  I especially like his work on “cultural liturgies.”  It’s something we all know to be true but too often take for granted.  Here’s a sample of his thinking from 2013.

Posted in Books, Faith, Internet, Teaching | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Acknowledging Emergence

One of the best things I took away from David Brooks’ The Social Animal is his thinking on emergent systems. His definition:

Emergent systems exist when different elements come together and produce something that is greater than the sum of their parts. Or, to put it differently, the pieces of a system interact, and out of their interaction something entirely new emerges.

In The Social Animal, Brooks calls poverty an emergent system because “the difficult thing about emergence is that it is very hard . . . to find the “root cause” of any problem” because there are multiple roots entwined.

Brooks calls marriage an emergent system. Culture is one, too. I think you can add institutions like churches and schools into the mix as well. I’ve spent years trying to figure out why students are tired all of the time. The problem could be homework, it could be social media, it could be sports, it could be some learning disability, it could be perfectionism, it could be online gaming. “Solving the problem” in one area doesn’t guarantee any kind of success because the problem is bigger than its “constituent parts.”

Brook’s solution? You “surround the person with a new culture . . . an immersive environment” that tells a different and better story. I think the early church got this right: an old world reordered around the real truth of the resurrected and ascended Jesus. And way too many people suffer unnecessarily because we can’t see bad things inadvertently caused by supposedly good systems.

Posted in Books, Teaching | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Can Wright Be Wrong?

Christianity Today in AprilN. T. Wright is the subject of this month’s Christianity Today cover story.  Tuesday they opened up the lead article online.  From the opening editor’s quote from Wright, you get a good sense of some quality, trust-worthy thinking:

When you really do business with the Bible at the fullest historical and theological level, then it is passionately and dramatically relevant, life changing, and community changing.

I wholeheartedly agree.  And few people besides the pastors and youth workers I have loved the most have helped me understand the story God is telling through the Bible and through life as well as N. T. Wright has.  Thankfully, though, the article (which you can find here) doesn’t skirt some of the very real concerns of Wright’s views.  The article’s author, Jason Byasse, catches it: according to Wright, “the church has misread Paul so severely, it seems, that no one fully understood the gospel from the time of the apostle to the time a certain British scholar started reading Paul in Greek in graduate school.”  Is it possible that one man sees the truth that so many Christians have missed for almost all of church history?  It’s a good question that I can admit to wondering myself.

Controversies aside, Wright has really helped me build some quality historical context for the New Testament.  His thinking has also helped me find ways to better articulate the Old Testament’s connection to the New.  It’s a “big picture” view that has helped me see parts in connection even as they remain parts.  And he does it with a tone (at least in the books of his that I have read, which are not necessarily his larger or more encyclopedic tomes) that really is pastoral (which the interview brings out as well).  The words of Byasse on Wright:

He insists that any theory advanced about Paul must be tested with actual exegesis, and he reads the Scriptures as someone happy to be doing so.  Most scholars talk about other scholars.  Only a blessed few talk about the Bible. Fewer still talk about God.

There are a dozen things I want to say about loving God and reading the Bible and talking well about Scripture, and Wright has helped me hold onto the Bible in a Christian culture that seems to get along well without it (or doesn’t get along well because it doesn’t know what to do with it).  I encourage you to give the article a look.  You don’t have to agree with everything it says (I’m still undecided on some of his views myself), but I think you’ll find the article’s perspective and its subject at least a little enlightening.

Posted in Faith, Internet | Tagged | Leave a comment

Muppet Intern Today; CEO Tomorrow

The latest Muppets movie, Muppets Most Wanted, has been out for a couple of weeks now.  And while it doesn’t pack the sentimental punch that the 2011 reboot did, it still has a nice amount of laughs.  If anything, they had a strong emotional story that wasn’t played up nearly as much as it could’ve been.  The folks over at BuzzFeed put together a fun little “what if you had Muppets for interns” clip that has some nice moments, too.

Posted in Internet, Movies | Tagged | 1 Comment

Spufford and a Different Kind of Apologetic

Spufford from The GuardianI’ve been meaning to write about Francis Spufford’s Unapologetic for some time.  I read the book at the end of last year and loved it.  It takes an interesting approach to the Christian faith, focusing on the emotional side of things.  In many ways, the eleventh grade class that I teach is an apologetics class that takes a more logical approach to things (because Christians aren’t just feelers; they are also thinkers).  I remind my students that logic is a tool, that it can only take you so far.  In an interview posted on Christianity Today‘s website last week, Spufford takes the other side of that:

I don’t really believe that the truth of Christianity can be demonstrated in public by logical tools. What can be done is for false claims about the improbability of Christianity to be pushed to one side, so that we have, once again, a clear space in which the conversation can happen . . . That is the contemporary European situation, where justification and defense are the wrong tools. What you need is a quiet, imaginative introduction of those things in the first place. You need to appeal to people’s existing knowledge about their lives. You need to say, “This stuff, far from being the far-off stereotype of which you have only distantly heard, is actually a recognizable way of talking about the heart you already possess.”

I kind of relate to Spufford’s European perspective on things.  In many subtle ways, I work in my own “post-Christian” environment.  He has a lot to say about things, and he says them all well  I highly encourage you to read the rest of the interview, which you can find here.

Posted in Faith, Internet, Teaching | Tagged , | Leave a comment