Friendship or Community

I’ve spent the last few days thinking about this post by Rod Dreher and the comments that it inspired.  The post, which consists almost entirely of a letter written by one of Dreher’s readers, was intended to be a kind if show-of-solidarity from a middle-class guy with so many others who are struggling in key ways.  Only one comment that I saw made note of this.  The rest of the comments were either condemnations or recommendations for the man.  A sobering paragraph:

I thank God for my dear children and my religious faith, because I could not endure this otherwise.  I am a Catholic who is faithful to the sacraments, but my experience of parish life is profoundly lonely. We attend a relatively large but shrinking suburban parish. The priest is a decent man, but his homilies are terrible, and it looks as if he sees his job as trying to get through the days and weeks without offending anyone. I try not to judge him harshly. I could not do what he does . . .  We are a gathering of strangers in that parish. We don’t know where we are going, or why we are going there. When my family first began attending it, I tried to get involved in the parish’s life, but I couldn’t sustain my efforts in the face of so much religious lethargy and indifference.

A few weeks ago my church entered into an unexpected time of concern and reflection.  The reflection, of course, is happening on multiple levels from multiple directions.  In the midst of this, many seem to be handling things well (though the question should be asked: what does it look like to genuinely handle difficult times as a church?).  Different people have different coping systems and different splinter communities to help process these things.

I, on the other hand, probably relate a bit too much with the Dreher reader (which would probably put me at odds with many of the people responding to the original post).  What’s interesting about institutions in general is the lack of a healthy, verbal framework to genuinely process difficult things.  Maybe there is some good to this (of course there is, right?).  But maybe there is a price to pay, too.  And that price is relational.

Friendship and formation, I think, are at the heart of this situation.  I can’t help but think, though, that many (most?) churches might be doing something deeply and categorically wrong with how we are being formed and (as a result) forming one another.  I cannot help but think that we have traded the possibility of genuine friendship for a kind of anemic community that rarely transcends its parts.  (Don’t get me wrong: it is good and right to step up when things are falling apart, when the budget is in shortfall, when the wheels have come off the wagon.  But dramatic surgery is intervention, not health). We might be dutifully starving ourselves of something vital.  We might be inadvertently silencing those with something to say, whose experience and concern might not line up with the verbalized concerns of the day.  And we press on even though (perhaps) almost a whole generation (or two) has supposedly walked out the door with no intent to return.

If you get a chance, I strongly encourage you to read the original post to Dreher’s site and the comments that it inspired.  A great picture of a very sad reality for many (but not that we could tell because most of those that have “moved on” are out-of-sight, out-of-mind).  We should be very careful of condemning the guy, for sure.  If we were more honest, we’d see ourselves feeling like him more than we’d care to admit.  And we’d find some way for those thoughts and concerns to see the light of day in something more like healthy community.

Continued tomorrow in “Walker Percy and the 98%” . . .

Posted in Faith, The Long Story | Leave a comment

The Music That Catches You

It’s been nice having a season of The Flash that hasn’t centered on a villainous speedster. The unfolding story of the Thinker has brought a nice twist to some familiar tropes of the superhero television genre.  The through-line of the “passengers on the bus” is also a nice way of broadening the shows antagonists (at least until this past week).

Here’s the trailer for the next episode, which drops in a couple of weeks.

Posted in Television | Tagged | Leave a comment

War through Time?

The CW is putting Supergirl on hiatus for a few weeks so that DC’s Legends of Tomorrow can have a solid Monday night run.  Here’s the trailer for this next Monday’s return of our time-correcting team.

Posted in Television | Tagged | Leave a comment

Ten Years and Closing

Listen for the comment made by Hemsworth about ten years and things coming to an end . . . I think we have every reason to believe that Avengers 3 and 4 will be complete game-changers for the Marvel Cinematic Universe.  Here’s a video concerning the MCU’s 10th Anniversary.

And here’s the Super Bowl trailer for Avengers: Infinity War, which drops in three short months.

Posted in Movies | Leave a comment

Anticipating the Fallout

Okay.  Only one . . . maybe two . . . more movie trailers for the week.  As much as I’d like to think that my taste in movies transcends franchises and sequels, there is something wonderfully comfortable about a series that pushes the limits while putting most of the toys in the box by flick’s end.  Which is one reason that Mission: Impossible- Fallout will probably be so enjoyable.  Here’s the first trailer for the movie, which opens in July.

Posted in Movies | Leave a comment

Best in the Galaxy Far, Far Away?

Well, the full trailer is much better than the teaser played during the first commercial break of the Super Bowl.  Even still, the jury will be out for a while on this one.

The struggle I foresee this movie having is that it’s the first Star Wars movie that many of think should actually be more funny than not.  We expect lots of quips and banter that doesn’t’t just amount to comic relief.  It will be interesting to see what, if any, balance actually occurs.

Posted in Movies | Tagged | Leave a comment

No Place Like Home?

Friday night saw the “wrap” of the Agents of SHIELD lost-in-the-future saga.  It will probably go down as one of the best arcs of the show’s run.  Now we’ve got a month to wait before the second half of the season airs.  Here’s the promo for the return, which looks to be a little bumpy (and with no acknowledgment of what ails Coulson).

Posted in Television | Tagged | Leave a comment

What We Owe to Each Other

This last part of the second season of The Good Place has seen the “existential quartet” confront “the Judge” to plead their case as changed people.  Last week we say each member face a challenge, a test, to see how much they had actually changed.  Here’s Tahani’s test:

The season finale aired Thursday night, and I just got the chance to catch it.  Perhaps the only thing more surprising that the way the first season ended is the finale of the second.   It took things in what is probably the most obvious direction  . . . which I didn’t see coming at all.  And all while using the language of ethics.  And it also folded back into something from the middle of the first season, which was pretty cool.

We’ve probably got a good while to wait for the third season.  Which is fine as long as they concoct a season as wonderfully enriching and twisted as this one.

Posted in Teaching, Television | Tagged | Leave a comment

Describing Generation Z

Gen-Z-CoverOne of the things that we talk about in our classroom discussions about ethics is the category of ethics known as “descriptive ethics.”  It really is as simple as the term itself: descriptive ethics is concerned with communicating what is seen concerning a particular group of people or a particular topic.  It’s also the one question on the test that everyone should get correct.

A great example of descriptive ethics dropped this last week.  The Barna Group (along with Impact 360) released a sleek and sobering look at today’s teenagers: Gen Z- The Culture, Beliefs, and Motivations Shaping the Next Generation.  One of the odd dynamics of the last few years (at least from my vantage point) has been the shift in cultural discussions to young adults (and away from youth).  As a teacher, I often have to take things written concerning college students and extrapolate down to high schoolers.  So it’s refreshing to find something that deals with this particular moment in the life of teenagers.  As such, it’s kind of brought back a strand of joy and challenge that I haven’t experienced in a few years, this idea of a report like this and the conversations that it can open up.

The question, of course, becomes “how do we effectively and purposefully pursue those questions?” particularly if they are questions that many of us have forgotten how to ask.

One of the most interesting trends in the book, but the way, is to see some of the ideological shifts that have taken place between millennials and “generation z” kids.  Granted, and Barna points this out, these Gen-Z kids are still being formed, so things are still up for grabs.  But while you can’t quite say that Gen-Z is more conservative, they are a little different, a little more open-minded in a healthy way.

+ + + + + + +

Two other quick observations/thoughts:

  1.  I think it’s cool that the Barna Group made some distinctions in the religious involvement level of the students interviewed and polled.  Throughout the book, “engaged Christians” and “churched Christians” are differentiated in their opinions.  This is mostly based on particular evangelical markers but also by how often teenagers attend church.  This adds a nice layer to the discussion.
  2. I really like how the study attempts to look at four main categories of interest: identity, worldview, motivations, and views on faith/church.  As these things are teased out through the report, points of connection and diversion becomes much clearer.

+ + + + + + +

One last thing of note from the book’s beginning.  Without going full “Benedict Option,” the president of Barna, David Kinnaman, notes an ideological shift from “Jerusalem to Babylon” in terms of culture and the role Christianity plays in it.  Instead of “faith at the center,” we now see “faith at the margins.”  A “simple life” has been replaced with a kind of “bitter/sweet tension.”  And while the idol in “Jerusalem” was “false piety,” the idol of this new “Babylon” is “fitting in and not missing out.”  And so the question stands: “Are we making disciples for Jerusalem when we need to be making disciples for Babylon?”

(image from barna.com)

Posted in Books, Teaching | Leave a comment

Thomas the Monk

From a recent homily concerning Thomas Aquinas, given by Fr. Aquinas Guilbeau, OP, someone I follow on Twitter.

The monk lives close to God through the ora—the prayer—of his life, which takes its preeminent form in the liturgy. The monk lives close to the things of God through the labora—the work—of his life, which is intellectual and not only physical. The monk interrogates the soil as his tills it. Through study and observation, the monk inquires about the causes and ends of the things before him. He poses the question “What?” to them. “What is this?” It’s a holy question. With it the monk probes the things that God has made, coaxing them to reveal their hidden, divinely given essences. This interrogation of things perfects the monk’s prayer, for through his questions the monk discovers the divine ideas inscribed in things, and thereby he absorbs the wisdom of the one who made them all. Besides being a holy question, “What?” is also a very practical one. Its monastic use has given the world many gifts: early medicine, Belgian beer, and the wines of Burgundy, as well as Gothic architecture, the scholastic method, and the science of genetics. Of course, monks aren’t the only ones to ask the question “What?” But given the graces of their vocation, monks are often good teachers of how to ask the question rightly.

Posted in Faith | Leave a comment