Not Perfect Apart from Us

When it’s time to start talking about “life in the fifth act” with my students, I often use Hebrews 11-12 as my starting point (which is why it’s neat that the passage is the New Testament epistle reading for the first few days of the new year).  The chapter, which is all about living by faith, presents a long list of fallible people who lived their lives in a particular, seemingly invisible, direction.  By the time you get to the part where individuals are no longer named, you’ve been totally synched to the passage’s rhythm.

And what more shall I say? For time would fail me to tell of Gideon, Barak, Samson, Jephthah, of David and Samuel and the prophets— who through faith conquered kingdoms, enforced justice, obtained promises, stopped the mouths of lions, quenched the power of fire, escaped the edge of the sword, were made strong out of weakness, became mighty in war, put foreign armies to flight. Women received back their dead by resurrection. Some were tortured, refusing to accept release, so that they might rise again to a better life. Others suffered mocking and flogging, and even chains and imprisonment. They were stoned, they were sawn in two,[a] they were killed with the sword. They went about in skins of sheep and goats, destitute, afflicted, mistreated— of whom the world was not worthy—wandering about in deserts and mountains, and in dens and caves of the earth.

And all these, though commended through their faith, did not receive what was promised, since God had provided something better for us, that apart from us they should not be made perfect.

But the chapter’s end is not the story’s end by any stretch of the imagination.  With the first two verses of chapter twelve, we find that all followers of Jesus are part of the story.  And we have a better understanding of what is appropriate for us by seeing the secondary example of those who have gone before us and the primary example of the founder and perfecter of the our faith: Jesus.

Therefore, since we are surrounded by so great a cloud of witnesses, let us also lay aside every weight, and sin which clings so closely, and let us run with endurance the race that is set before us, looking to Jesus, the founder and perfecter of our faith, who for the joy that was set before him endured the cross, despising the shame, and is seated at the right hand of the throne of God.

Posted in Faith, Life in the Fifth Act, Scripture | Leave a comment

Non-Curiosity, the New Standard?

candySeth Godin asked a good question today of contemporary culture and our relationship with curiosity:

The bestselling novel of 1961 was Allen Drury’s Advise and Consent. Millions of people read this 690-page political novel. In 2016, the big sellers were coloring books.

Fifteen years ago, cable channels like TLC (the “L” stood for Learning), Bravo and the History Channel (the “History” stood for History) promised to add texture and information to the blighted TV landscape. Now these networks run shows about marrying people based on how well they kiss.

And of course, newspapers won Pulitzer prizes for telling us things we didn’t want to hear. We’ve responded by not buying newspapers any more.

The decline of thoughtful media has been discussed for a century. This is not new. What is new: A fundamental shift not just in the profit-seeking gatekeepers, but in the culture as a whole . . .

Is it possible we’ve made things simpler than they ought to be, and established non-curiosity as the new standard?

It’s strange to think that we would have “made things simpler than they out to be,” but I think Godin is on to something.  In our race to make things palatable, easily digestible, we’ve inadvertently made a culture where we think we have become instant masters of things.  And instead of persevering and learning the ins-and-outs of complex things, we walk away thinking we know it all because we have mastered one thing.

Godin continues:

While it’s foolish to choose to be stupid, it’s cultural suicide to decide that insights, theories and truth don’t actually matter. If we don’t care to learn more, we won’t spend time or resources on knowledge.

We can survive if we eat candy for an entire day, but if we put the greenmarkets out of business along the way, all that’s left is candy.

And, of course, ultimately we won’t know any different.  Godin’s solution is a good one, perhaps a little more idealistic than others might expect.

Even if only a few people use precise words, employ thoughtful reasoning and ask difficult questions, it still forces those around them to catch up. It’s easy to imagine a slippery slope down, but there’s also the cultural ratchet, a positive function in which people race to learn more and understand more so they can keep up with those around them.

Turn the ratchet.

You can read all of Godin’s thoughts on curiosity and “turning the ratchet” here.  It’s a good, challenging read.

(image from candy.com)

Posted in Internet, Teaching | Leave a comment

Strangers and Exiles, Seeking

Today’s daily office reading from Hebrews 11 captures one of my favorite snippets in what is an already-amazing chapter.  After talking about Abel and Noah, Abraham and Sarah, the writer digs in for a bit:

These all died in faith, not having received the things promised, but having seen them and greeted them from afar, and having acknowledged that they were strangers and exiles on the earth. For people who speak thus make it clear that they are seeking a homeland. If they had been thinking of that land from which they had gone out, they would have had opportunity to return. But as it is, they desire a better country, that is, a heavenly one. Therefore God is not ashamed to be called their God, for he has prepared for them a city.

These ancients were commended for their faith.  They saw Someone who could not be seen.  They received much, but not the Thing that would last.  And for that, they were strangers and exiles, misfitted in the very place God made for His image-bearers to rule.  But a better country awaited them, a prepared city, a place to call home.

Posted in Faith, Life in the Fifth Act, Scripture | Leave a comment

Another Way the Force Wakes Up

rogue-one-forceMuch digital ink has been spilled over the last year writing about the return of the Star Wars franchise to the big screen, for with Star Wars: The Force Awakens and most recently with Rogue One: A Star Wars Story.  A recent article by Marc Barnes at First Things addresses one thing that the new movies have brought a course correction to the much-maligned prequels.

One of the most significant issues long-time fans of Star Wars have with the prequels is the inclusion of midi-chlorians to the concept of the Force.  After three movies of the Force being mysterious and elusive, we find out something completely different.  From First Things:

In the prequels, the Force is a part of the biological world. It is accessed not by the mind or spirit but by microscopic organisms. This view renders the Jedi religion superfluous—one either has a “high midi-chlorian count,” or one does not. The prequels rewrite the Jedi’s disciplined access to the mystical life as something determined by a blood-test.

This secularization of the Force coincides with its most grotesque, irreverent use. The Jedi of the originals were concerned with not using the Force, with the profound need for being “ready” to wield it. Yoda told Luke he will be able to discern the ways of the Force “when you are calm, at peace. Passive.” He restricted its use: “A Jedi uses the Force for knowledge and defense, never for attack.” He warned that the “quick and easy path” is precisely what makes one an “agent of evil.”

Barnes then points out that a younger Yoda uses the Force in all kinds of ways that seem to go against his later teaching.  With the newer movies, though, Barnes sees a good and necessary change in how the Force is treated, one that hearkens back to how it was handled in the original trilogy.

But in the new Star Wars movies (2015-), something else has been happening. In The Force Awakens, Han Solo derides Finn’s blithe mechanization of the Force as an easy answer to the problem of how to disable some shields: “That’s not how the Force works!” This shut-down of Finn’s use-the-cool-Force attitude indicates a shift in the new Star Wars movies, a certain return of the religious dimension that fueled the originals—a return to reverence.

This turn achieves its maturity in Rogue One. If the prequels scooped the sacred from the Force by biologizing and technologizing it, Rogue One returns it by spiritualizing and refusing to use the Force. Physical sight can no longer behold the Force. Its main adherent is Chirrut Îmwe, a blind warrior-monk who believes in the power of the Force. Îmwe’s temple has been destroyed by an imperial power, and thus, deprived of any obvious geographical site of the sacred, he must carry the evidence of the Force that “binds the galaxy together” by his own prayer and upright action.

A nice save, really.  One I’m interested in seeing built on in the next few Skywalker-centric movies.  Barnes sums it up best near the end of his article:

The religious emphasis of the film is not how to use the Force, but how to conform oneself to something that is beyond use. We do not hear the iconic line, “Use the force,” in Rogue One. We hear a reverent one: “Trust the force.” The difference between use and trust sums up the difference between magic and religion. Magic wishes to use supernatural powers for material ends. Religion wishes to subordinate material ends to a good and wise supernatural power. Rogue One elevates the disciple over the magician and the saint over the technician.

You can read the whole article here.  It’s a good read.  It’s also another reminder of how a good movie can work on multiple levels well, even if it isn’t necessarily intended to.

(image from collider.com)

Posted in Faith, Movies | Tagged | Leave a comment

Assurance, Conviction, Commendation

Today’s epistolary reading from the daily office is the first third of one of my favorite chapters from one of my favorite books: Hebrews 11.  The chapter finishes out over the rest of the week.  The chapter rings loudly, even after the rousing commands of chapter 10 to draw near, hold fast, and consider key aspects of the Christian life and story.  Chapter 11, of course, focuses on faith.

Now faith is the assurance of things hoped for, the conviction of things not seen. For by it the people of old received their commendation. By faith we understand that the universe was created by the word of God, so that what is seen was not made out of things that are visible.

Faith is vital to the Christian life but tricky in its translation to those outside of church.  It is not simply hope (as good as hope is).  It is an assurance of things hoped for.  It is not pie-in-the-sky wishful thinking.  It is a conviction concerning things we cannot see.  And because of faith, “the people of old received their commendation.”  Most of the remaining chapter points us to those ancient people, commended in spite of their faults and failures.

Nestled in between Abel and Enoch and Noah we find a potent promise concerning faith, particularly in light of Enoch:

. . . without faith it is impossible to please him, for whoever would draw near to God must believe that he exists and that he rewards those who seek him.

Someone recently asked me how they could grow in their relationship with God.  I encouraged the friend to go for some long walks and talk to God as if He was walking along with him.  True: God is walking along with him.  But it is also an act of faith to believe it when you cannot see it.

Today’s reading ended with Abraham and Sarah.  And with that reminder comes the nudge that faith isn’t just about achieving your personal best, about having grit, about some kind of individual empowerment.  Instead, it is faith in the context of a purposeful story, a history going somewhere.  Abraham was

looking forward to the city that has foundations, whose designer and builder is God.

That becomes a thread that takes center stage in tomorrow’s reading.

Posted in Faith, Life in the Fifth Act, Scripture | Leave a comment

Sherlock and the Posthumous Game (or There’s Something About Mary)

sherlock-bloodhoundLast night saw the premiere of the fourth (and many assume final) series of Sherlock on Masterpiece Mystery.  Perhaps its a repeat of my thoughts on Doctor Who‘s Christmas special, where absence has made the heart grow fonder.  I can’t help but admit, though, that I really enjoyed “The Six Thatchers.”

The Title Mystery.  It took a while for the title’s meaning to work for me.  And while it’s sort of unfortunate that the mystery involved a main member of the cast (always tricky when there are so many other stories to tell), it was enough to keep me guessing.  And while the mystery ultimately transcended Mary, she was its ultimate victim,

The Return of the Tech.  Part of what made the initial premise of Sherlock so interesting was the idea of a detective immersed in the modern world of blogs and tweets and information-on-demand.  While that theme might have always been there, it was once again a pronounced part of the storytelling.  And, for the most part, it worked.  I didn’t totally buy into Sherlock’s use of it as the episode opened, but then things evened out.  I always like the text message overlay, which “The Six Thatchers” used quite well.

Lady Mary.  As good as it was seeing Cumberbatch and Freeman back in the game, Amanda Abbington’s Mary was the real acting high-point for the episode.  She played it so well, the fine line between loving present and violent past.  I quite liked her scene on the airplane and even, yes, at the episode’s end.  It’s a shame that we didn’t see more of Mary on the job.  She plays others well.

Pulling at the Loose Threads.  This episode also reminded us that the show’s main three might work like a well-oiled machine but that they also have nuance and weaknesses.  I particularly liked the scene between Sherlock and Mrs. Hudson when he confessed his arrogance and gave her the power to keep him in check.  It was painful seeing Watson’s dalliance throughout the episode.  I imagine his “you made a vow” cry at the end was as self-directed as anything Sherlock did or did not do.  The question of Moriarty still hangs over the show.  I like how Mary subverted Moriarty’s “miss me.”  Nice touch of self-awareness for the show.  I still imagine that Moffatt and friends have a deeper story to tell.  I’m just not sure that Moriarty is the crux of it.

Here’s the trailer for next week’s episode.  Toby Jones plays villains brilliantly, so I expect to be at least a little creeped out.

(image from metro.co.uk)

Posted in Internet, Television | Tagged | Leave a comment

Checking the Settings

settings_logoYesterday Michael Dougherty of The Week tweeted what I am assuming is his version of a “new year’s resolution,” and I like it a lot.

Process setting. System setting. Ritual setting.

Not goal setting.

Don’t get me wrong.  I have some goals that I’m working on finalizing.  But I like his approach to process, systems, and rituals.  It’s a good echo of Smith and You Are What You Love.

I think a lot of us spent a large amount of 2016 realizing that our settings were off.  Maybe not all of them, maybe not by much, but at least enough to reconsider how to go about moving through the year 2017.  One some level, the process-system-ritual distinction almost feels redundant.  Process, though, is how you do a particular thing.  Example: this is how I make this particular decision.  System, on the other hand, is how your collection of processes work together (or don’t work together, even).  System implies a certain kind of checks-and-balances that keeps total equilibrium in mind.  Ritual feels a little different, the third but ancient jewel in the beautiful ring.  Ritual speaks of action rooted in something deeper, more significant, than  process and system.  Perhaps it even points to greater purpose.

(image from TheConTech.com)

Posted in Internet, The Long Story | Leave a comment

Don’t Get Captured

chainsThis morning’s routine was thrown out of whack because of the holiday.  God bless the good folks at Zippy’s for putting up with people like me early each Sunday.  Instead, I had a quick breakfast at Starbucks before heading to church.

I spent some time writing and thinking about the new year.  I was greatly encouraged by the Epistle reading from the daily office.  From Colossians 2 (ESV):

Therefore, as you received Christ Jesus the Lord, so walk in him, rooted and built up in him and established in the faith, just as you were taught, abounding in thanksgiving.

See to it that no one takes you captive by philosophy and empty deceit, according to human tradition, according to the elemental spirits[a] of the world, and not according to Christ. For in him the whole fullness of deity dwells bodily, and you have been filled in him, who is the head of all rule and authority.  In him also you were circumcised with a circumcision made without hands, by putting off the body of the flesh, by the circumcision of Christ, having been buried with him in baptism, in which you were also raised with him through faith in the powerful working of God, who raised him from the dead.

This passage is, of course, Christmas-y, and points to the incarnation (“for in him the whole fullness of deity swells bodily).  It also points to a fifth-act reality for the Christian: that we “have been filled in him,” which is an odd phrase that the NIV renders “and in Christ you have been brought to fullness,” which reads a little easier.  Along with that, we who have received Him are to “walk in him,” should be “rooted and built up in him and established in the faith.”  “Rooted” and “built up” are two good images to start the new year and to keep in mind during Christmastide.  Paul encouraged the Colossian Christians to do this “as [they] were taught” all the while “abounding in thanksgiving.”

A fifth act life is one of avoiding capture from philosophies and ideas not rooted in the truth of Jesus.  For those on the outside, this might look like a command to ignorance, which isn’t true at all.  It doesn’t mean we cease seeking understanding or stop pursuing engagement with those who think differently.  It does mean, I think, that Christians start with what (and Who) they know.

(image from WFUV.org)

Posted in Faith, Life in the Fifth Act, Scripture | Leave a comment

The Last of 2016

wootton-majorAnd so ends a year that our culture has anthropomorphized for the last couple of months.  Thought I’d end a year in posts with something other than a “best-of” list (though I would like to get around to that at some point).  So here’s my list of “last things” for the year.

Last Novel.  I didn’t read as much fiction as I’d planned in 2016.  The last novel I read this year took me longer than I had expected (not because it was a long novel, mind you).  Francis Spufford’s Golden Hill, released earlier this year in England and later next year in America, tells the story of a mysterious man who shows up in early New York with a bank note beyond the means of many.  The novel takes so many wonderful twists (wonderful might not be the best word) that makes the story utterly unpredictable (to the very end) and also a great Christmas read.

Last Book of Non-Fiction.  I finished Anthony Esolen’s Ten Ways to Destroy the Imagination of Your Child just minutes before landing in Honolulu today.  For a book about the humanities, it sure did make me feel a little guilty and a little sad.  I’ll get more into the book later (and I also mentioned it a couple of days ago).  It’s a great read, one that serves as a reminder of what feels like a long-lost era, even though it was only a handful of years ago.

Last TV Show- Cable.  “The Return of Doctor Mysterio,” which I wrote about here.

Last TV Show- Network.  The season finale and reunion show for this fall’s Survivor: Millennials vs. Generation X, which I wrote about here.

Last Short Story.  Thanks to Anthony Esolen, I finally got around to reading J. R. R. Tolkien’s “Smith of Wootton.”  It reads like a nice companion piece to “Leaf by Niggle,” taking a more magical, faery-like approach to looking at gains and losses and the nature of the world.  Definitely something worth reading once a year.

Last 2016 Movie.  On the final leg of my flight back to Honolulu today, the plane had a full array of movie options.  I tried watching the reboot of Ghostbusters, but stopped about 30 minutes in.  Not a horrible movie; just not something with a real hook for me.  Thanks to the time-period of Golden Hill, I decided to watch Love and Friendship.  It played in Honolulu for a few weeks and had great reviews.  I just didn’t make the time for it.  The movie is an adaptation of a Jane Austen short story.  The most notable cast member was Kate Beckinsale, who played her part perfectly.  Some strange editing choices, but the great one-liners more than make up for any narrative rough spots.

Posted in Books, Movies, Television, Travel | Leave a comment

“The Land of My Sojourn”

At the final Behold the Lamb of God concert this Christmas season, Andrew Peterson added Rich Mullins’ “Land of My Sojourn” to his set list.  It’s the final song on Mullins’ masterpiece, A Liturgy, A Legacy, and a Ragamuffin Band.  Jill Phillips is signing back-up.  It’s worth watching (and then revisiting its source material).

Posted in Faith, Music, Travel | Leave a comment