Last month I posted a couple of links to Comment Magazine (along with an extended quote from Henri Nouwen) on the topic of loneliness. Comment’s most recent issue is about social isolation, and little by little they have released parts of the issue online for free. The most recent article, written by Brian Dijkema, has to do with social isolation and work. He starts the article with a sobering realization:
If you work full time for the same amount of years that your children are in the house (let’s say twenty-five), you will have spent fifty thousand hours with your colleagues. That is a lot of time. So much time that it’s possible that at the end of that quarter century, you will have spent more of your waking time at work than with your kids as they grew up.
My first response as I contemplated this was . . . depression.
That’s really a depressing thought . . . and I don’t even have kids. But I do get the sense of the challenge of proportion and the reality of how we spend our time. This is even true for teachers, who often cite extended summer vacations as a reason for pursuing the job. But for a single guy like me, even extended summer vacations away from routine and a more consistent presence of others, can be something of a struggle.
Dijkema has a lot of good things to say about the workplace as a necessary social environment. It’s a well-cited article (and he even links to some classic Looney Tunes workplace humor!) that is good reading for lots of people, especially for those who lead out. One of the article’s best quotes:
The basis for determining the value of human work is not primarily the kind of work being done but the fact that the one who is doing it is a person. The sources of the dignity of work are to be sought primarily in the subjective dimension, not in the objective one. . . . In the final analysis it is always man [the Latin here is hominem, plural homines, or people] who is the purpose of the work, whatever work it is that is done by man—even if the common scale of values rates it as the merest “service,” as the most monotonous even the most alienating work.
Among the many things Dijkema accomplishes in the article is the reminder that work can be and should be good, that there is both personal and social dignity in how we “make a living.” And while the language of unions is pretty foreign to me, I get a sense of what he means when he talks about leading and challenging through dignity. It’s a good article that you can read here in its entirety.
+ + + + + + +
Speaking of work and vacation, I’m now a week out from my last official meetings for the year. And while I’ve still got stuff to do, I’m also just under a week from heading out for a mainland excursion that will include about five states. So the days are much quieter right now, which is both good and a challenge for me. Dijkema’s article is a good reminder for the social significance of work, even when you don’t necessarily have to go in.
(image from itpulse.com.ng)
This weekend saw the release of another movie about friendship. TAG tells the based-on-real-life story of a group of friends who found a way to play “tag” for decades after graduating from high school. The movie is almost more action than comedy. Even still, there are some truly raw moments here as well. And it’s not just the desperation that the characters feel (which is also true of Are You Here). It’s the sense of something important being at stake with the game. One of the main characters, played by Ed Helms, sees the game as a necessary extension of a good life lived together . . . and a source of solidarity amongst those who are often “it.” On the opposite end of the game-spectrum is Jeremy Renner’s character, who has spent the past 30 years “never being ‘it.'” And as farcical as the movie can be, there’s something real beating at the heart of it.
It’s odd to think about how quickly our culture became mediated by digital technology. I started up a blog soon after moving to Hawaii to keep friends and family back home aware of my life. Facebook took on that role, too, though it added graduates into the mix. Like many others, I found Instagram to be an interestingly creative approach to picture taking (though I still can’t take a great picture of the food I’m about to eat). Twitter became a way for me to, for lack of a better term, eavesdrop on writers and movie-makers and organizations that really pushed me creatively and spiritually. Compared to Facebook and Instagram, Twitter was a real social wasteland, though. For every one hundred Facebook friends, I found one friend who was actively tweeting or re-tweeting. I drew the line at SnapChat. Even though I have friends who use the app well, mostly for extended family things, it was just a bridge too far for me.
Just over a year ago I posted
It’s always good to find writers you appreciate writing well about the stories you love. Even though I can’t yet bring myself to reread the Harry Potter series, I always enjoy reading things about the story of “the boy who lived,” including the essays by Alan Jacobs about Potter’s adventures. So I was doubly-glad to see him posting 



