Curt Thompson’s The Soul of Desire is the kind of book that paints a picture that you know is beyond your grasp. He’s a professional writing from his own experience about a kind of community-building that he has created and refined and has great control of. But I think that’s okay, even if it is a “crumbs from your table” kind of scenario.
Because we all need to learn to do the things that Thompson suggests in the book. When we are at our best, we do those things naturally: being present, asking questions, helping each other see how God is at work. Much like Made for People and How to Know a Person, practical things are given that churches and the people in them can find ways to be better Christians together.
Thompson ends the book with a list of four questions, two of which he spent a decent amount of time with earlier in the book. These four questions are diagnostic questions that help us talk and think together. They help us locate ourselves: our feelings, our motives, our hopes, and ultimately our desires. They are:
- Where are you?
- What do you want?
- Can you drink the cup?
- Do you love me?
The first question is straight from the Genesis story of Adam, Eve, and God after the couple have eaten from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. The remaining three are from Jesus and reflect conversations he had with those needing healing, James and John (and their mother) positioning for power, and Peter as part of his “reinstatement” at the end of John’s Gospel. At one point Thompson asserts that these questions can (and probably should) be asked by people in all kinds of settings, including work. It really would be interesting to ask “where are you?” at the beginning of every meeting. (I check in with my people more broadly/personally at the beginning of most meetings. Maybe I should try this for a while instead.)
+ + + + + + +
As I type this, I’m about halfway through the book that Thompson wrote between The Anatomy of the Soul and The Soul of Desire. I’m really enjoying The Soul of Shame, mostly because of how I know it fits with Thompson’s bigger picture (since I essentially skipped from book one to book three). At the very least, Thompson gives his readers food for thought. He’s also giving us questions to ask and dispositions and postures to maintain while thinking and asking and listening. I think we’d all do well to listen to what he has to say.
Thompson’s The Soul of Desire has a lot in common with the recent work of Andrew Root (When Church Stops Working and Evangelism in an Age of Despair), it’s just that Thompson starts with the individual and moves quickly to the communal. Both writers want us to think about what it means to sit with someone else, what it means to discern the work of God in the life of a person trying to make sense of the mess of life. Root’s approach is more organic; Thompson’s is more organized and (for lack of a better term) psychologized. Thompson also starts with a nice nod to Smith’s You Are What You Love and about mankind’s nature to want, to desire (thus the book’s title). A quote from early in The Soul of Desire:
One of the books that I finished reading during my summer retreat was Fountain of Salvation by Fred Sanders. Unlike The Deep Things of God, Sanders’s other recent book on the Christian doctrine of the Trinity, Fountain of Salvation is a collection of essays that cover a wide number of angles in relation to the Christian assertion of the triune nature of God. Even though it read like a more academic book, Fountain of Salvation still had a great authorial voice that brought in a broad collection of sources from the Christian tradition about the connection between the Trinity and salvation.
(I do believe, by the way, that it’s difficult making and viewing superhero movies post-Endgame. By the end of Marvel’s “Infinity Saga,” viewers were used to quality storytelling involving multiple characters interacting on multiple levels. Spider-Man: No Way Home was able to replicate that density well because it brought in two other Spider-Men. You could argue that also worked with Deadpool/Wolverine and its use of the multiverse. All to say that even the best superhero movie post-Endgame will likely feel slight. And so you walk into Superman with advice given by others: think of it like the first Iron Man movie, when there wasn’t much expectation of anything too far beyond it.)



